Henderson v. O'Conor
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
On June 7, 1893, the Consolidated National Bank, incorporated under the national banking laws of the United States, was doing a general banking business in the city of San Diego in this state, but on June 21, 1893, failed, and suspended payment; and on July 23,1893, the defendant was appointed receiver of said bank.
On said seventh day of June, 1893, the plaintiff deposited with that bank for collection a draft in her favor drawn by the Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company, of Newark, New Jersey, on the National State Bank of Newark, New Jersey, for the sum of fifteen hundred and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commercial Bank of Pa. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- McLeod v. EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Importers & Traders' National Bank v. PetersNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- First National Bank v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Armstrong v. National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Anderson v. Pacific BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Luckehe v. First Nat. Bk. of MarysvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Plumas County Bank v. Bank of Rideout, Smith & Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Guignon v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1899
- National Bank of New Zealand, Ltd. v. FinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.