Legal Opinion
Plumas County Bank v. Bank of Rideout, Smith & Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided March 19, 1913No. Sac. No. 1964PublishedCited by 21 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County and from an order refusing a new trial. J. C. Gray, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Plaintiff sued for the sum of fifteen thousand dollars alleged to be a deposit properly to its credit in the bank of defendant corporation. From a judgment against it and from an order denying its motion for a new trial the Plumas County Bank appeals.
Regarding the facts of this case there is very little dispute. Indeed the bill of exceptions is made up in part of an agreed statement of facts, those essential to this opinion being as follows:
“On October 28, 1907, the plaintiff bank had on deposit, subject to check, in the defendant bank, over $15,000.00, and the defendant bank had on deposit…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Davis v. Elmira Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Bank of the Republic v. MillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Cragie v. . HadleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Marine Bank v. Fulton BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Security Nat. Bank of Sioux City v. Old Nat. Bank of Battle CreekCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
- Arnold v. San Ramon Valley BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- American Surety Co. of New York v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Luckehe v. First Nat. Bk. of MarysvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Acme Hay & Mill Feed Co. v. Metropolitan National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.