Legal Opinion
McCullough v. Xerox Corp.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided May 2, 2013No. 12-CV-6405LPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Loretha J. McCullough, brings this action against her former employer, Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”). McCullough alleges that Xerox discriminated against her on account of her race and sex, that Xerox retaliated against her for having opposed that discrimination, and that she has been denied equal pay for equal work, also on account of her race and sex.
Xerox has moved to dismiss all of plaintiffs claims under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, other *383than her claim that she was paid less than similarly situated…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Laura Holtz v. Rockefeller & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sosa v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ. & Marcy BergerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Hughes v. Xerox Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- Whitt v. Kaleida HealthDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- Aslin v. University of RochesterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019
- Brand v. New Rochelle City School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.