Locascio v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action to recover damages against the Northern Pacific Railway Company for maintaining an einbankment across Lincoln street in northeast Minneapolis. The court directed a verdict for the defendant, and the plaintiffs appeal from the order denying their motion for a new trial.
The city passed an ordinance, comprehensive • in character, which was accepted by the defendant, for the separation of street and railway grades in northeast Minneapolis. In that portion of the city there are grade crossings; in some instances the street and railroad grades are separated, the railroad tracks passing…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Reis v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Vanderburgh v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Vacation of Part of Town of HibbingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Erickson v. HorlykSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- In re HullSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- City of Crookston v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Sheridan Drive-In Theatre, Inc. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
- Hetland v. CapaldiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
- State v. KohlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.