Legal Opinion

Locascio v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 5, 1932No. 28,724PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action to recover damages against the Northern Pacific Railway Company for maintaining an einbankment across Lincoln street in northeast Minneapolis. The court directed a verdict for the defendant, and the plaintiffs appeal from the order denying their motion for a new trial.

The city passed an ordinance, comprehensive • in character, which was accepted by the defendant, for the separation of street and railway grades in northeast Minneapolis. In that portion of the city there are grade crossings; in some instances the street and railroad grades are separated, the railroad tracks passing…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Reis v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Vanderburgh v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Vacation of Part of Town of HibbingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Erickson v. HorlykSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  5. In re HullSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. City of Crookston v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Sheridan Drive-In Theatre, Inc. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Hetland v. CapaldiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  5. State v. KohlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API