Legal Opinion

City of Crookston v. Erickson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 15, 1955No. 36,313, 36,314, 36,315PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Christianson, Justice.

This case presents separate appeals by property owners from judgments entered pursuant to the jury’s award of damages in condemnation proceedings instituted by the city of Crookston. The land condemned is located just outside the southern limits of Crookston and was acquired as the site for a proposed new sewage treatment and disposal plant for that city. We are concerned here mainly with three parcels of land which for convenience will he referred to as tracts A, B, and C. 2

Tract A is heavily wooded land bounded on the west by the Bed Lake Biver and contains…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Adams v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  3. Vacation of Part of Town of HibbingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Andrews v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  5. Erickson v. HorlykSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. TomkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State Highway Commission v. BloomSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Thomsen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. La Plata Elec. Ass'n, Inc. v. CumminsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  5. City of Tampa v. Texas CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API