Legal Opinion

Strohmaier v. Wisconsin Gas & Electric Co

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The plaintiffs claim: (1) That the defendant Gas Company was negligent in not having a man on the job or within ready call while the work of digging the trenches was progressing to turn off the gas in case of the breaking of service pipes by the contractor, especially in view of the frequency with which the contractor had theretofore severed service pipes; (2) that the court erroneously rejected evidence offered by the plaintiffs of the previous breaking of service pipes by the contractor; and (3) that the contractor was negligent in severing the service pipe connected with the Strohmaier…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kuehn v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Nemet v. City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Morgan v. Village of StoweSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
  4. Portland Gas & Coke Co. v. GiebischOregon Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Potter v. City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Richey & Gilbert Co. v. Northwestern Natural Gas Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Weber v. City of HurleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Willmar Gas Co. Inc. v. DuininckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Brown v. Wisconsin Natural Gas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API