Legal Opinion
Bliss v. Gotham Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 21, 1963No. 17795PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGER T. FOLEY, Senior District Judge.
In this action for infringement of Bliss Design Patent D-174,793, covering a design for a pitcher, joined with a claim of unfair competition, plaintiffs, the appellants here, appeal from the judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division holding invalid and not infringed the said patent and further holding that neither of the appellees have competed unfairly with the appellants.
The District Court had jurisdiction of appellants’ first claim or cause of action by virtue of Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1338(a).
Judge Solomon,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Truck Equipment Service Company, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Fruehauf Corporation, Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Sicilia Di R. Biebow & Co. v. Ronald C. Cox and Sales U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- M. O. S. Corporation v. John I. Haas Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Animal Fair, Inc. v. Amfesco Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
- John A. Neal and John G. Duffy, Individually and Dba Workshop Publications, a Co-Partnership v. Thomas Organ Co., a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.