Legal Opinion
M. O. S. Corporation v. John I. Haas Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 21, 1967No. 20750_1PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
Appellant, the holder of the patent in suit, appeals from a judgment in favor of appellee in an action for infringement. This is the second appeal in this case. In M. O. S. Corp. v. John I. Haas Co., 9 Cir., 1964, 332 F.2d 910, we reversed a judgment in favor of appellee. We held that it was error for the trial court to apply the doctrine of file wrapper estoppel in deciding that the patent was not infringed. We did not rule on the validity of the patent. Upon remand, the trial court received additional evidence. It again found that the patent was not infringed, but did…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Thos. P. Gonzalez Corporation v. Consejo Nacional De Produccion De Costa Rica, and Sergio Quiros MarotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Libby, McNeill, & Libby v. City National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Carl J. Mollnow v. Paul K. CarltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Raymond R. James v. Robert M. Reese, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Jacobson v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.