State ex rel. Simpson v. Mayo
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTS, Justice.
This is an application for the writ of habeas corpus, in which petitioner alleged that he was convicted of robbery upon the false and perjured testimony of an accomplice, and that such testimony was induced by the threats and promises of reward made to the witness by the Honorable Clifton M. Kelly, County Solicitor, knowing such testimony to be false. The affidavit of the *425witness in question, Amos Pierce, was appended, in which Amos stated that he implicated petitioner in his testimony at the trial because the County Solicitor and the Sheriff told him that they would see that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Pyle v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- White v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
3Cited by1 opinion
- Simpson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964