Legal Opinion

Howell v. Anderson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1902No. 12,324PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from the district court for Saunders county. In the matter of the estate of Daniel Howell, deceased. From an order refusing to discharge Peter Anderson, administrator, he appealed to the district court, and from an order reversing the judgment Sarah M. Howell and others bring error. Tried below before Good, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, 0.

On the 28th day of March, 1899, one Daniel Howell, a resident of Saunders county, died intestate, and on the *5761st day of June of the said year Peter Anderson, the defendant in error, was duly appointed administrator of his estate, gave his bond, was duly qualified and entered upon the performance of his duties as such administrator. It appears that at the time Howell died, Anderson owed him $700, which was evidenced by an interest-bearing note executed some time before that date. When Anderson took charge of the estate as administrator, he scheduled and listed his note as a debt due…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stevens v. GaylordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  2. Baucus v. . StoverNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Tarbell v. JewettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  4. McCarty v. FrazerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  5. Walker v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re Connolly's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Danielson v. RedenbaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  3. McEwen v. FletcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  4. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. DowneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  5. Costigan v. KrausCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API