Legal Opinion

Costigan v. Kraus

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 13, 1914PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Campbell Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Miller

Affirming on Cross-Appeal and Reversing on Appeal.

Joseph J. Humbrecht qualified as the executor of the will of his father, Joseph N. Humbrecht, in October, 1906, with the appellant Costigan as surety upon his bond.

*819The testator bequeathed legacies to twenty persons, aggregating $3,650.00. The residue of the estate was given to Joseph J. Humbrecht, the son.

The executor having failed to pay the legacies, the legatees brought this action on February 12, 1912, against the executor and his surety, to collect them.

The appraisers appointed by the county court valued…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Conklin v. Egerton's AdministratorNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  2. Clay v. HartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1838
  3. McCarty v. FrazerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. Walker v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. State ex rel. McClamrock v. GregoryIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tucker v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. McKinzie v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  4. Cawood v. Cawood's Adm'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  5. Moore v. BrandenburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API