Legal Opinion
Uncle v. N. JERSEY PINELANDS COMMISSION
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 19, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
275 N.J. Super. 82 (1994)
645 A.2d 788
FRANCIS UNCLE AND FRED VAHLSING, III, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
NEW JERSEY PINELANDS COMMISSION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted May 24, 1994.
Decided July 19, 1994.
Before Judges BRODY, STERN and KEEFE.
Malsbury, Armenante & Podraza, attorneys for appellants (Sharon M. Podraza, on the brief; Frank P. Armenante, on the reply brief).
Deborah T. Poritz, Attorney General, attorney for respondent (Mary C. Jacobson, Asst. Attorney General, of counsel; Rachel Horowitz, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).
The opinion…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Schmidt v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF NEWARKSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Gardner v. New Jersey Pinelands CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- BD. OF ADJUST. OF CITY OF SAN ANTONIO v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Andover Tp. v. LakeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Do-Wop Corp. v. City of RahwaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- In re Certificate of Need Granted to the HarborageNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- PEG LEG WEBB, LLC VS. NEW JERSEY PINELANDS COMMISSION (NEW JERSEY PINELANDS COMMISSION)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
- PHOENIX PINELANDS CORPORATION, ETC. VS. HARRY DAVIDOFF (C-000246-11, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021