Legal Opinion
Julius Hyman v. Joseph Regenstein
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 23, 1955No. 15105PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
Upon reconsideration of the matter, we are not convinced of the correctness of the trial court’s action in granting the summary judgment at the time and in the circumstances shown by the record. What causes us concern is appellant’s contention that he has not yet been permitted to prove his ease; that he was cut off by the district court from introducing all of his evidence; and that, without affording him a hearing for the presentation of such evidence, the court granted a summary judgment against him.
On the former hearing, we considered that the appellant was relying…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Whitaker v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Walling v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Consolidated Fisheries Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- The Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Hyman v. RegensteinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Fay Slagle, a Widow, Etc. And the Service Mutual Insurance Company of Texas v. United States of America and Texas Air National GuardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Florida Tomato Packers v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- William G. Libby v. L.J. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.