Legal Opinion

Woodruff v. Adams

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1840PublishedCited by 8 opinions

ERROR to the La Grange Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDewey, J.

Trespass quare clausum fregit. Plea, general issue; verdict and judgment for plaintiff.

The Court instructed the jury, that, if the lessor of land for the purpose of raising thereon a single crop on shares, was to receive his share of the product standing on the ground, he would not be a trespasser by entering on that part of the close on which his share was growing; but if the tenant was to deliver to him his portion of the harvest on other premises than those let, the tenant alone could maintain trespass for a breach of the close committed during the term of letting. The defendant excepted…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bradish v. SchenckNew York Supreme Court · 1811

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lindley v. KelleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co. v. LinardIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Switzer v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Hart v. State ex rel. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Keaton v. SniderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API