Legal Opinion

Keaton v. Snider

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 1895No. 1,861PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Prom the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

The record shows that the appellant owned a crop of corn cultivated by him on rented land in Hancock county; that while the corn was growing the appellee wrongfully permitted his cattle to enter upon the land and destroy the corn; that appellant sued appellee before a justice of the peace in Shelby county to recover the value of the corn destroyed. On *67appeal to the circuit court a demurrer was sustained to the complaint. The only question presented on this appeal for our consideration is one of jurisdiction. If this is an action for trespass on real estate, the jurisdiction is in Hancock…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lindley v. KelleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Owens v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Loeb v. MathisIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Bennett v. McIntireIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Heavilon v. HeavilonIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Keaton v. SniderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Grace v. CoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Overmyer v. BarnettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API