Legal Opinion

Fordeck-Kemerly Electric, Inc. v. Helmkamp

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1992No. 17A03-9111-CV-354PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATON, Judge.

Fordeck-Kemerly Electric, Inc. and Interior Products Supply appeal from a judgment in favor of James and Ann Helm kamp refusing to enforce mechanics Hens on certain real estate owned by the Helm-kamps. They raise two issues, which we consolidate as one:

| Whether a recorded "Addendum to Construction Agreement" was enforceable as a no-ien contract pursuant to Indiana Code 32-8-8-1.

We affirm.

The record reveals that James and Ann Helmkamp are engaged in the retail sale of automobiles under the corporate guise of Helmkamp, Inc., a closely held corporation of which they are the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vanderburgh County Board of Commissioners v. RittenhouseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Urbanational Developers, Inc. v. Shamrock Engineering, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Burras v. Canal Construction & Design Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Citizens Progress Co. v. James O. Held & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Torres v. Meyer Paving Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Feitler v. Springfield Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Fred C. Feitler, Mary Anna Feitler, and the Feitler Family Trust v. Springfield Enterprises, Inc., J. Laurie Commercial Floors, LLC, d/b/a Jack Lauries Floor Designs, JM Woodworking Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API