Legal Opinion
Burras v. Canal Construction & Design Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 20, 1984No. 1-483 A 103PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFF, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
This is an action for the breach of a construction contract. At trial, Canal Construction and Design (Canal) was awarded $9,864.07 in damages and $12,000 in fees based on the Burras' breach of the contract. - The Burrases were awarded $7,970.00 on their counterclaim against Canal for defective performance and breach of Warranty but denied relief on certain other theories in their counterclaim. This denial together with the trial court's award of compensatory damages and its refusal to award the Burrases punitive damages form the basis of their appeal. The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Management Services Corp. v. Development AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Martin v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Pioneer Constructors v. SymesArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Litzelswope v. MitchellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Fort Wayne Bank Building, Inc. v. Bank Building & Equipment Corp. of AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- City of Indianapolis v. Twin Lakes Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- DeChristofaro v. MacHalaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- Hamlin v. StewardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Yin v. Society National Bank IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Abbey Villas Development Corp. v. Site Contractors, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.