Legal Opinion

Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 15, 2017No. A16-1810PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JESSON, Judge

Appellant Security Bank & Trust, as trustee and personal representative for a decedent, challenges the district court’s dismissal on the pleadings of its legal-*823malpractice claim arising from estate planning services performed by respondent Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren. We conclude that because some damage occurred before the decedent’s death, when he signed the estate planning documents pursuant to the attorneys’ advice, the cause of action accrued at that time. Thus, the bank, as personal representative, succeeded to the decedent’s claim under Minnesota’s survival…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Park Nicollet Clinic v. HamannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. Belt v. Oppenheimer, Blend, Harrison & Tate, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sec. Bank & Trust Co. v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  2. Laymon v. Minnesota Premier Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API