Legal Opinion

Cox v. . Lighting Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 29, 1909PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, being a stockholder of the New Bern Lighting and Fuel Company, hereinafter called the gas company, a corporation, instituted this action in behalf of himself and all creditors of the corporation, alleging the insolvency of the defendant corporation. Upon the demand of the plaintiff, a receiver was appointed to wind up its affairs. The court directed the receiver to advertise for claims against the defendant, and authorized and directed said receiver to determine the priority of all claims which were contended to be encumbrances on the property of defendant. Whereupon S.W.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. New Orleans RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Ford v. . CobbNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. Tifft v. . HortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Potter v. . CromwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  5. Binkley v. ForknerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Springs v. . Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. M. & J. Finance Corp. v. HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Beatrice Creamery Co. v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  4. Springs v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Weisenberger v. Lone Star Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API