Legal Opinion

AutoXchange. Com, Inc. v. Dreyer and Reinbold, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 2004No. 49A05-0402-CV-108PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellants-Third Party Plaintiffs, Au-toXchange.com, Inc. (AutoXchange) and Donald Tabor (Tabor) (collectively, Appellants), appeal the trial court's denial of their motion to strike and award of partial summary judgment in favor of Appellee Third Party Defendant, Dreyer & Rein-bold, Inc. (Dreyer & Reinbold).

We affirm and remand.

ISSUES

Appellants raise four issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as follows:

1. Whether the trial court erred in denying Appellants' motion to strike certain portions of Dreyer & Reinbold's supplemental designation…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rosi v. Business Furniture Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Cullison v. MedleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Ayres v. Indian Heights Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Menard, Inc. v. Dage-MTI, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Levee v. BeechingIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. First Farmers Bank & Trust Co. v. WhorleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Filip v. BlockIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Breining v. HarknessIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Bambi's Roofing, Inc. v. MoriartyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Crafton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API