AutoXchange. Com, Inc. v. Dreyer and Reinbold, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants-Third Party Plaintiffs, Au-toXchange.com, Inc. (AutoXchange) and Donald Tabor (Tabor) (collectively, Appellants), appeal the trial court's denial of their motion to strike and award of partial summary judgment in favor of Appellee Third Party Defendant, Dreyer & Rein-bold, Inc. (Dreyer & Reinbold).
We affirm and remand.
ISSUES
Appellants raise four issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as follows:
1. Whether the trial court erred in denying Appellants' motion to strike certain portions of Dreyer & Reinbold's supplemental designation…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Rosi v. Business Furniture Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Cullison v. MedleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Ayres v. Indian Heights Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Menard, Inc. v. Dage-MTI, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Levee v. BeechingIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- First Farmers Bank & Trust Co. v. WhorleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Filip v. BlockIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Breining v. HarknessIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Bambi's Roofing, Inc. v. MoriartyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Crafton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.