Legal Opinion
Breining v. Harkness
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 21, 2007No. 49A04-0611-CV-649PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAILEY, Judge.
Case Summary
Appellant-Plaintiff Walter Breining (“Walter”), as attorney-in-fact for Raymond Breining (“Raymond”), now deceased, 1 appeals a grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellee-Defendant Richard Harkness (“Harkness”) upon a claim against Harkness for conversion. We affirm the grant of summary judgment, reverse the denial of attorney’s fees, and remand for a hearing on attorney’s fees.
Issues
Walter raises the sole issue of whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment to Harkness.
Harkness cross-appeals and alleges that the trial court erred by denying…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- AutoXchange. Com, Inc. v. Dreyer and Reinbold, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Kahn v. CundiffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Shambaugh & Son, Inc. v. CarlisleIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- American Management, Inc. v. MIF Realty, L.P.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Indianapolis Downs, LLC v. HerrIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Kroger Co. v. PlonskiIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Old National Bank v. Steven Kelly, Jon A. Cook, and Rebecca F. Cook, individually and on behalf of others similarly situatedIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Wagner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Chapo v. Jefferson County Plan CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Hitesh Seth v. Midland Funding, LLC, as an Assignee of Columbus Bank and Trust as Issuer of Aspire VisaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.