Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Parker
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 31, 1949No. Civ. 7541PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYZANSKI, District Judge.
Plaintiff and his wife Naomi are citizens of- and domiciled in Pennsylvania. During his service as Lt. Colonel in India, she came to Massachusetts and met defendant who is a citizen and domiciliary of Massachusetts. Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that defendant, intending “to deprive him of the comfort, society, aid and assistance of Naomi”, enticed her to continue absent from his home (Par. II) and “debauched and carnally knew the plaintiff’s said wife” (Par. III). The parties have stipulated “that the alleged acts upon which the plaintiff is bringing this action are…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Bigaouette v. PauletMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Murphy v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- CIPOLLA v. ShaposkaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Norman I. Suchomajcz, Administrator of the Estate of Norman Suchomajcz, a Minor v. Hummel Chemical Company, Newark, New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Schmidt v. Driscoll Hotel, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Jacqueline Suzanne Agathe Jagiella, A/K/A Jacqueline Rigaux Jagiella v. Waclav James Constantine Jagiella, A/K/A Waclav J. JagiellaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.