Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Driscoll Hotel, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 12, 1957No. 36,973PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

Plaintiff, Herbert G. Schmidt, a minor, instituted this action by his mother and natural guardian, Matie T. Schmidt, against the Driscoll Hotel, Inc., doing business as The Hook-Em-Cow Bar and Cafe in South St. Paul, for damages alleged to have resulted from defendant’s illegal sale of intoxicants to one John Sorrenson.

The complaint alleged that defendant illegally sold intoxicating liquors to Sorrenson to the extent of causing him to become intoxicated in defendant’s establishment in South St. Paul so that shortly thereafter, as a proximate result thereof, plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Watson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Young v. MasciSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Levy v. Daniels' U-Drive Auto Renting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  4. Adamson v. DoughertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Gordon v. ParkerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Ingersoll v. KleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Bernhard v. Harrah's ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API