Legal Opinion

Seminole B. & L. Assn. v. Levit

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1932No. Appeal 199PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldkigb, J.,

This appeal followed the discharge of a rule to show cause why a sheriff’s sale should not be set aside.

On January 29, 1931, plaintiff entered judgment against the defendant under a bond secured by second mortgage on the premises known as 2128 North 58th Street, Philadelphia; damages were assessed at $2,-171.68. On December 7, 1931, the premises were sold at sheriff’s sale to the plaintiff. On December 14, 1931, the sheriff executed and acknowledged a deed to the purchaser. Defendant obtained a rule on March 29, 1932, to show cause why the sheriff’s sale should not be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frank P. Miller Paper Co. v. Keystone Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Rittenberg v. Stein SpechtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Podol v. ShevlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Public Security Co. v. TurnbullSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. LoveSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Pfaff v. H. T. Smith Express Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Com. v. Ford, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Reihart v. Hess, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fulton County1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API