Legal Opinion
Vaughn v. Love
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 12, 1936No. Appeal, 214PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Kephart,
The summons in assumpsit and statement of claim were returned by the sheriff “Served W. H. Robinson ... by leaving a . . . copy . . . with Catherine Giel, maid, an adult member of his family at his resi dence, 1432 Beecliwood Boulevard, Pittsburgh. . . .” The service was attacked by the defendant through his counsel appearing d. b. e., Avho asked that it be stricken off. The reasons assigned Avere that defendant was not a resident of Pittsburgh but of Florida; that he was not present in Pennsylvania Avhen the writ and statement were served, and had not…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- The Lafayette Ins. Co. v. FRENCHSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Hart v. SansomSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Peterson v. Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Hollinger v. HollingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Cohen v. Brandywine Raceway AssociationSuperior Court of Delaware · 1968
- Steven F. LudlowWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.