Legal Opinion

Public Security Co. v. Turnbull

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1930No. Appeal 93PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The setting aside of a judicial sale of real estate is a matter within the sound discretion of the court below and its action will not be disturbed except in a clear case of abuse of discretion: Schekter v. Katler, 95 Pa. Superior Ct. 226. If one is seeking such equitable relief, he must act promptly. It is too late to seek the court’s aid after the acknowledgment, delivery and recording of the deed; the title has then passed and the court is without power to hct: Evans v. Maury, 112 Pa. 300; Media T. & T. Co. v. Kelly et al., 185 Pa. 131; Lengert v. Chaninel, 208 Pa.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Media Title & Trust Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. Lengert v. ChaninelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Evans v. MaurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  4. Schekter v. KatlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Seminole B. & L. Assn. v. LevitSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Wilson v. McHale, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API