Legal Opinion
Electric Smelting & Aluminum Co. v. Carborundum Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania
Decided November 24, 1900No. 10PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Equity. Suit by the Electric Smelting & Aluminum Company against the Carborundum Company. On settlement of decree for complainant.
1Opinion of the Court
BUFFINGTON, District
(now Circuit) Judge. In this case the Circuit Court of Appeals, reversing the lower court, held the respondent infringed claims 1, 2, and 4 of the process patent of Cowles, No. 319,795, but had not infringed either claim 1 or 2 of the apparatus patent in suit. 102 Fed. 618, 42 C. C. A. 537. That court further said:
“The decree of the Circuit Court is reversed, with directions to enter a decree for the complainant in accordance with this opinion, but without costs heretofore incurred to either party.”
It is. now moved to enter a decree, and varying forms of proper decrees…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Consolidated Roller-Mill Co. v. CoombsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1889
- McCrary v. Pennsylvania Canal Co.United States Circuit Court · 1880
- Sanders v. LoganU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1861
- Ballard v. City of PittsburghU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1882
- Electric Smelting & Aluminum Co. v. Carborundum Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carborundum Co. v. Electric Smelting & Aluminum Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1913
- Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Landis Tool Co. v. IngleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
- Curtiss Aerocar Co. v. SpringerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936