Legal Opinion
Curtiss Aerocar Co. v. Springer
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 31, 1936No. 7842Published
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
Appellant is the owner of two design patents for trailer vehicles. In a suit between it and Harris & Schafer, Inc., these patents were adjudged valid, first in the District Court on June 16, 1933, and again in this court on March 8, 1934. Harris & Schafer, Inc., v. Curtiss Aerocar Co., 69 F.(2d) 264. Appellee is using a trailer which infringes the patents. ^ This trailer appellee purchased from Harris & Schafer, Inc., while the appeal of that company was pending here. Lie testified that he bought it on Mr. Llarris’ assurance that he had a bond up and had the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Bauer & Cie v. O'DonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Birdsell v. ShaliolSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- National Marking MacH. Co. v. Triumph Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.