Legal Opinion
Landis Tool Co. v. Ingle
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 31, 1923No. 2876PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
This case in different aspects has been before this court several times. It was brought in the District Court by Arthur H. Ingle, as assignee of the Carey patent, No. 1,244,449, for boring machines, charging the Landis Tool Company and the Gurney Electric Elevator Company with infringement of all its claims. The defendants in their answer did not deny the validity of the patent; indeed, they admitted its validity in a counterclaim in which the Landis Tool Company asserted ownership of the patent, charged the complainant with infringement, asked for an injunction…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barnard v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- Winchester Repeating Arms Co. v. OlmstedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
- Consolidated Roller-Mill Co. v. CoombsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1889
- McCrary v. Pennsylvania Canal Co.United States Circuit Court · 1880
- Rousso v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Uihlein v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
- Henson v. Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Hudson Auto Supply Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1930
- Colonial Book Co. v. Amsco School Publications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
- (SS) Threlkeld v. Commissioner Of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.