Legal Opinion

Gould v. Gould

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1925PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jambs A. O’Gorman,

Referee. The objections filed on behalf of the beneficiaries involve charges of violations of fiduciary duty, unauthorized and improvident investments, commingling of trust funds With individual funds, charging principal with payments payable from income, the acceptance and retention by certain of the trustees of underwriting syndicate profits and other secret commissions in connection with trust transactions, and the use of trust funds in railroad enterprises, in which the trustees, or some of them, had large personal interests.

*59The testator died in the city of New York on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Carrier v. . CarrierNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Adair v. . BrimmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Willis v. . SharpNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Lawrence v. . LittlefieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Globe Woolen Co. v. Utica Gas & Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Michael Kolentus v. Avco Corporation and Avco Precision Products Division, Avco Corporation, and Chemical BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. Mulcahy v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  3. In re the Estate of AyvazianNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  4. Newhoff v. Rankow, Cohen & Isaac, P. C.New York Surrogate's Court · 1980
  5. In re the Estate of ShepardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API