Legal Opinion

Brandt v. Eckman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 11, 1949No. 32215PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.

1. Special ground 11 of the motion for a new trial complains of the court’s failure to grant the defendant’s motion for a nonsuit. “The overruling of a motion for a nonsuit cannot be reviewed by motion for a new trial, but should be made the subject of direct exception.” Willis v. Seiberling Rubber Company, 44 Ga. App. 468 (161 S. E. 789), and cit.

2. Special ground 13 complains of the admission of certain hearsay evidence. This ground does not set out the evidence complained of. It is, therefore, so incomplete as to present no question for consideration by this court. Cathey v. State, 28 Ga.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Clare v. DrexlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. Cox v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  3. Cathey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  4. Haskins v. Throne, Franklin & AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Griffin v. Colonial BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Consulting Construction Corp. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  2. Young v. HigingbothamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API