Legal Opinion
Brockman v. Merabank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 17, 1994No. 93-15505PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRIS, Circuit Judge:
The Resolution Trust Corporation appeals the district court’s decision to sua sponte remand this case to state court after the removing party, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, was dismissed from the action. We have jurisdiction, 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(Z )(3)(C), and we reverse.
FACTS
This action was originally commenced in Arizona Superior Court by appellee Shirley Brockman, as natural mother and special conservator of Michael Brockman, against Merabank, a federal savings bank, and various other individual defendants. The complaint alleged various state law causes of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- American National Red Cross v. S. G.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- New Rock Asset Partners, L.P. v. Preferred Entity Advancements, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Williams v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Adair v. Lease Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- New Rock Asset Partners, L.P. v. Preferred Entity Advancements, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Brockman v. MerabankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.