Legal Opinion

Brockman v. Merabank

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 17, 1994No. 93-15505PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

40 F.3d 1013

Shirley BROCKMAN, as natural mother and special conservator

of Michael D. Brockman, an incapacitated person,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MERABANK, a federal savings bank, Defendant,

and

Resolution Trust Corporation, a corporation, instrumentality

an agency of the United States, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-15505.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Sept. 13, 1994.

Decided Nov. 17, 1994.

Phyllis J. Towzey, Carter, Stein, Schaaf & Towzey, St. Petersburg, FL, for defendant-appellant.

D. Kim Lough and Julianne C. Wheeler, Jennings & Haug, Phoenix, AZ, for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. American National Red Cross v. S. G.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. HIF Bio, Inc. v. Yung Shin Pharmaceuticals Industrial Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. Intransit, Inc. v. Excel North American Road Transport, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2006
  3. Majeske v. Bay City Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
  4. Feigel v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1996
  5. West Coast, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API