State Ex Rel. Underwood v. Watson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBaeNhill, J.
While the motions and counter-motions challenge-the propriety of a large number of allegations in the pleadings, the order striking the allegations in the answers undertaking to set up a cross action against Lee County is the real crux of the controversy. If the judgment below is sustained in this respect most of the other challenged allegations, both in the reply and in the answers, go out as a matter of course.
The defendants allege, in substance, that during Watson’s tenure of office Lee County instituted numerous tax foreclosure actions, which were prosecuted to final judgment; that as a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ripple v. Mortgage & Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- State Ex Rel. Lee v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- King v. . PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Wood v. Citizens BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Gilmore v. . WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Watson v. . Lee CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Underwood v. WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Gwathmey Dobie v. . PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876