Legal Opinion

United States v. Poindexter

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 15, 1990No. Crim. No. 88-0080-01. Misc. No. 90-0045 (HHG)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge.

Seven news organizations have applied for access to the videotaped deposition of President Reagan, to be held February 16, 1990 at the United States Courthouse in Los Angeles. 1 The request implicates in varying degrees rights of the news organizations, the former President, the defendant, the prosecution, and the public. The Court has carefully considered all these interests.

I

On February 5, 1990, the Court ordered that former President Reagan testify by videotaped deposition at the defendant’s trial. The Order declared that the Court would…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. In Re Washington Post Company, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Amicus Curiae. Appeal of Washington Post Company. United States of America v. Michael Agboutui Soussoudis, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Amicus Curiae. Appeal of Washington Post Company. United States of America v. Michael Agboutui Soussoudis, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. CianfraniDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Abu MarzookDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  2. New York v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  3. United States v. RessamDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API