Legal Opinion
United States v. William J. Frank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 7, 1994No. 93-10063PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge:
The only significant issue in this case is whether the district judge participated in plea bargaining in such a manner as to enti- tie the defendant to -withdraw his plea. We decide that he did not.
Facts
Frank was charged with various narcotics offenses and went to trial. On the third day of trial, April 9, 1992, the lawyers were to be in the courthouse at 8 a.m., to appear in court for any matters to be taken up before the jury came in at 8:30. When the lawyers arrived, Frank’s attorney, Mr. Polis, approached the Assistant United States Attorney, Mr. Bostwick, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Robert BolingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Kenneth R. BruceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Becky Wallace, Annette Neil v. Dunn Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Lazaro Modesto DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Ramon Angel CaroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. BurnsideCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. BierdCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- United States v. IsomCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Tim CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Cano-VarelaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.