Legal Opinion

United States v. Cano-Varela

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 10, 2007No. 06-8020PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.

Marco Antonio Cano-Varela entered a pretrial status conference disappointed with the plea deal his lawyer had helped negotiate and displeased with his lawyer’s provision of Spanish-language discovery materials. He intended to request a change of counsel so that he could go to trial on drug charges. During the confer ence, however, the district court informed Mr. Cano-Varela that he would potentially face a vastly longer sentence if he went to trial and was convicted than if he pleaded guilty. Two weeks later, Mr. Cano-Varela accepted the government’s plea deal. We…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. Kenneth R. BruceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Gregory Lynn Miles, United States of America v. Gerald Jehoram GustusCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. BurnsideCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Anthony DavilaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. Kenneth KyleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  5. Crumb v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API