United States v. Cano-Varela
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.
Marco Antonio Cano-Varela entered a pretrial status conference disappointed with the plea deal his lawyer had helped negotiate and displeased with his lawyer’s provision of Spanish-language discovery materials. He intended to request a change of counsel so that he could go to trial on drug charges. During the confer ence, however, the district court informed Mr. Cano-Varela that he would potentially face a vastly longer sentence if he went to trial and was convicted than if he pleaded guilty. Two weeks later, Mr. Cano-Varela accepted the government’s plea deal. We…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Kenneth R. BruceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Gregory Lynn Miles, United States of America v. Gerald Jehoram GustusCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. BurnsideCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Anthony DavilaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Kenneth KyleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Crumb v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.