Legal Opinion

General Shoe Corp. v. Rosen

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided August 26, 1939No. 3649PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McCLINTIC, District Judge.

The plaintiff, General Shoe Corporation, brought this suit in equity to enjoin the defendant, Isadore Rosen, trading as The Friendly Men’s Shop, from infringing its trade-marks “Friendly” and “The Friendly Five” and to enjoin defendant from further commission of certain alleged acts of unfair competition. Plaintiff merely seeks injunctive relief and is not asking for damages.

Plaintiff is a Tennessee corporation doing business under the name Jarman Shoe Company, and is engaged in the manufacture and sale of shoes. It came into existence in 1925, at which time it…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Saxlehner v. Eisner & Mendelson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. William R. Warner & Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Prestonettes, Inc. v. CotySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Columbia Mill Co. v. AlcornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Caron Corporation v. Wolf Drug Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API