Legal Opinion
Pinkney v. James B. Clow & Sons, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 18, 1965No. 6 Div. 848PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWYN, Justice.
This is a workmen’s compensation case. There was judgment denying compensation. The employee brings this “appeal by cer-tiorari” (Code 1940, Tit. 26, § 297) to review that judgment.
The employee filed his verified complaint in the circuit court of Jefferson County pursuant to Code 1940, Tit. 26, § 304. The employer filed several pleas to the complaint, as amended, asserting that the action “is barred by the statute of limitations of one year,” that is, Code 1940, Tit. 26, § 296, and Tit. 7, § 26. The employee filed two special replications to these pleas, in which he alleged…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Alabama Textile Products Corporation v. GranthamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Head v. Triangle Construction CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Bryant v. Central Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Bass v. Cowikee MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Young v. City of HuntsvilleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
- Thompson and Co. Contractors v. ColeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
- Mead Paper Co. v. BrizendineCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
- Harbin v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Calvert v. FunderburgSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.