Legal Opinion

Tucker v. City of Ocilla

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1952No. 17902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hawkins, Justice.

A filling station does not constitute a nuisance per se. Rushing v. Thigpen, 200 Ga. 313 (2) (37 S. E. 2d, 180), and citations.

Section 3 of the act (Ga. L. 1946, p. 191; Code, Ann. Supp., § 69-803) provides in part: “In each municipality in which the governing authority undertakes to exercise the powers conferred in this Chapter such authority shall appoint a board of not less than three or more than seven members to be known as the Municipal Planning Board. . . Any citizen of the municipality may be appointed to membership on the board except members of the municipal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Albany v. LippittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Arteaga v. ArteagaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  3. Adams v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  4. New Mission Baptist Church v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  5. Rushing v. ThigpenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sikes v. PierceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  2. Davis v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  3. Security Feed & Seed Co. of Thomasville, Inc. v. NeSmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API