Legal Opinion

City of Bismarck v. Preston

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1985No. Cr. 1075PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Justice.

This action involves the admission of evidence of an alcohol breath test at a court trial. The lower court admitted the test result as circumstantial evidence of Roy Preston’s intoxication, and Preston takes exception to the use of the evidence. We affirm.

On April .19, 1984, at approximately 8 p.m., Joseph and Vicky Mills observed Roy Preston operating his vehicle in an erratic and dangerous manner. Preston backed into the Millses’ vehicle, causing minimal damage. After a short conversation with Joseph Mills, Preston left the scene. The Millses then left the area and,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MankeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Piper v. PiperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. PuhrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. AlleryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Grand Forks v. RisserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Hoover v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. RaulstonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. FalkNorth Dakota Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API