Legal Opinion

Hoover v. Director, North Dakota Department of Transportation

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 2008No. 20070258PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Kenneth Paul Hoover appeals from a judgment affirming the Department of Transportation’s suspension of his driving privileges for 180 days for driving under the influence of alcohol. We conclude there was sufficient evidence to establish that Hoover was the driver of a vehicle involved in a hit and run accident and that a police officer did not violate Hoover’s Fourth Amendment rights by making a warrantless entry into Hoover’s bedroom. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] At 9:50 p.m. on March 3, 2007, Nicole Heintz was driving south on north Washington Street in Bismarck and stopped in…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Washington v. ChrismanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. State v. KitchenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McCoy v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Abernathey v. Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. BluntNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. City of Devils Lake v. GroveNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Lange v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API