Legal Opinion

Piper v. Piper

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1976No. Civ. 9125PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial. In Piper v. Piper, 234 N.W.2d 621 (N.D.1975), we denied a motion seeking the dismissal of this appeal, holding that the appellant had not accepted benefits under the judgment and therefore had not waived the right to appeal.

The decree which awarded Kay a divorce from Richard also awarded Kay the custody of the two minor children of the marriage and gave her a savings account of $6,082.50, a checking account of $100.00, a Buick automobile, a home in Casselton, all household goods and effects in the Casselton…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fischer v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  2. City of Wahpeton v. Drake-Henne, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Kresel v. GieseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Schuh v. Allery Ex Rel. AlleryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Agrest v. AgrestNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Nastrom v. NastromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hoge v. HogeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Nygaard v. RobinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Porter v. PorterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Stee v. "L" Monte Industries, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API