Legal Opinion

St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center v. Edmondson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1997No. 22895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This case concerns a declaratory ruling by the Industrial Commission (the Commission) relating to workers’ compensation medical benefits. We conclude that the Commission was correct in declaring that under the circumstances of this case the surety is not required to make direct payment to a provider of medical services, and that the claimant’s attorney is entitled to a lien against the medical benefits awarded to the worker. We do not address whether the provider was entitled to notice of the compensability determination because the issue is moot. We do not address whether…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Paulson v. Idaho Forest Industries, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Downey Chiropractic Clinic v. Nampa Restaurant Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Bradshaw v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Curr v. CurrIdaho Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. AdamcikIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Gomez v. DURA MARK, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Neel v. Western Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Thompson v. Burley Inn, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Nelson v. Big Lost River Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API