Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Nelson v. Big Lost River Irrigation District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1999No. 24093Published

1Concurrence

Chief Justice TROUT,

specially concurring.

The Appellants complain that the trial court erred by failing to issue a writ of mandate ordering the BLRID to comply with election laws. The Court holds that because the trial court properly ordered a new election, the issue of whether the writ should have issued becomes moot. I disagree. Whether the trial court should have issued a writ of mandate requiring compliance with election laws does not become moot simply because a new election is ordered. The BLRID has a continuing obligation to comply with duties required by statute. Instead, a case…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Industrial Commission of the StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  2. St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center v. EdmondsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API