Novak v. Jane Boyle, Unpublished Decision (11-3-2005)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ORIGINAL ACTION JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
{¶ 1} On October 14, 2005, the petitioner, Martin Novak, commenced this prohibition action against the respondent, Judge Mary Jane Boyle. For the following reasons, this court denies the applica-tion for a writ of prohibition, sua sponte.
{¶ 2} The underlying case, Washington Mutual Bank FA, Successor ininterest to Bank United v. Martin Novak, et al., Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Case No. CV. 435579, over which Judge Boyle presides, is a foreclosure action. A review of the docket indicates that on June 8, 2005, the trial court adopted the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. FiliaggiOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of BereaOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- State ex rel. Rootstown Local School District Board of Education v. Portage County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Clark v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- CapitalSource Bank v. HnatiukOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Harvest Credit Mgt. VII, L.L.C. v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- LV Reis, Inc. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2017