Legal Opinion

People v. Wallace

California Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1892No. 20884PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.

The defendant was charged by information with the crime of grand larceny, and appeals from a j'udgment of conviction, and an order denying his motion for a new trial.

*4991. Upon his arraignment, the defendant moved to set aside the information, upon the ground that he was not legally committed before its filing. The motion was denied, and the exception to this ruling is made a part of the record by a bill of exceptions, from which it appears that defendant was in fact examined before a justice of the peace upon a charge of grand larceny, and as a result of such examination, an order was made by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. People v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Ex parte BraniganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  5. People v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. HinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. SiemsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. People v. TarboxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. State v. RozumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API