Legal Opinion
Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Carey Dwyer Eckhart Mason & Spring, P.A.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided December 6, 1999No. 98-5447PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
CERTIFICATION FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA AND THE HONORABLE JUSTICES THEREOF:
It appears to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit that this case presents an important issue of Florida law that has not been directly addressed by the Supreme Court of Florida. Accordingly, we believe the issue is appropriate for resolution by Florida’s highest court and defer our decision in this case pending certification of the issue to the Supreme Court of Florida. To frame this issue for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Miami v. BrooksSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Edwards v. FordSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Diaz v. PiquetteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Kellermeyer v. MillerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fremont Indem. Company v. Carey, Dwyer, Eckert, Mason & Spring, PaSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Carey Dwyer Eckhart Mason & Spring, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Fremont Indemnity Company v. Carey Dwyer Eckhart Mason & SpringCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Fremont Indemnity v. Carey DwyerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999