Legal Opinion
Diaz v. Piquette
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 28, 1986No. 86-51PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
496 So.2d 239 (1986)
Bismark DIAZ and Bis D. Corp., Appellants,
v.
William J. PIQUETTE, Appellee.
No. 86-51.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
October 28, 1986.
Taylor, Brion, Buker & Greene and Arnaldo Velez, Miami, for appellants.
Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Strickroot and John R. Kelso, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
We reverse the summary judgment entered below on limitations grounds upon the determination that the period for commencing an action on appellants' claim for alleged legal malpractice…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moore v. MorrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Amfac Distribution Corp. v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Bowman v. AbramsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Diaz v. RodriguezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Birnholz v. BlakeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Knight v. FurlowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Haghayegh v. ClarkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Bierman v. MillerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Lenahan v. RUSSELL L. FORKEY, PADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.