Legal Opinion · Concurrence

White v. Diamond International Corp.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1983No. Nos. 5795, 5796Published

1ConcurrenceThomas, Justice

senting, with whom ROONEY, Chief Justice, joins.

I can concur in the result which' is reached by the majority opinion with respect to Cheyenne Lumber Company, but I can only do so upon a different ground ttjan that relied upon in the majority opinion. I must dissent with respect to the disposition *470of this case as to Diamond International Corporation. I would reverse that judgment on the ground that the lien statement was not properly verified as required by the language of § 29-2-109, W.S.1977, which provides in the part here pertinent:

“ * * * which [the lien] in all eases shall be verified by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mitchell Planing Mill Co. v. AllisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  2. H.A.M.S. Co. v. Electrical Contractors of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. D. J. Fair Lumber Co. v. KarlinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. Stephenson v. Ketchikan Spruce Mills, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Bell & Zajicek, Inc. v. Heyward-Robinson Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API